Difference between revisions of "Talk:VCS package guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (moved Talk:Arch CVS & SVN PKGBUILD guidelines to Talk:VCS PKGBUILD guidelines: This page is not specific to cvs and svn...)
(update)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
A: Look at http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245213
 
A: Look at http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245213
 
  
 
----
 
----
 
  
 
Just wondering if the versionpkg part will be removed - I hear that makepkg now has versionpkgs functionality...
 
Just wondering if the versionpkg part will be removed - I hear that makepkg now has versionpkgs functionality...
Line 11: Line 9:
  
 
-- done (wide-eye)
 
-- done (wide-eye)
 
  
 
----
 
----
  
 
The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --[[User:Mentallaxative|mentallaxative]] 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 
The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --[[User:Mentallaxative|mentallaxative]] 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
: I agree. --[[User:Matthewbauer|Matthewbauer]] 17:16, 21 July 2009 (EDT)
+
 
 +
-- I agree. --[[User:Matthewbauer|Matthewbauer]] 17:16, 21 July 2009 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
-- done --[[User:Shining|shining]] 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)
  
 
----
 
----
  
 
What's the reason for using 'cp -r $_svnmod $_svnmod-build' instead of using 'svn export $_svnmod $_svnmod-build'?--[[User:BertiBoeller|BertiBoeller]] 19:21, 15 March 2009 (EDT)
 
What's the reason for using 'cp -r $_svnmod $_svnmod-build' instead of using 'svn export $_svnmod $_svnmod-build'?--[[User:BertiBoeller|BertiBoeller]] 19:21, 15 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
-- no reason afaik. Please send a patch against /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD-svn.proto from abs package to the bug tracker. --[[User:Shining|shining]] 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)
  
 
----
 
----
  
 
Does the AUR still reject PKGBUILDs without a source=() and md5sum=() field? I don't think so - I have many PKGBUILDs up without them. [[User:Alex anthony|Alex anthony]] 20:29, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
 
Does the AUR still reject PKGBUILDs without a source=() and md5sum=() field? I don't think so - I have many PKGBUILDs up without them. [[User:Alex anthony|Alex anthony]] 20:29, 12 August 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
-- I updated the page accordingly. --[[User:Shining|shining]] 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:59, 4 October 2009

Q: Any reason for using 'svn co' instead of 'svn export'? export is way faster for these situations and it doesn't create all the .svn files.

A: Look at http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245213


Just wondering if the versionpkg part will be removed - I hear that makepkg now has versionpkgs functionality... --ak5 16:55, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

-- done (wide-eye)


The title for this article indicate guidelines for CVS and SVN, but git and darcs are also included. Perhaps the title should be changed to reflect this, or git and darcs guidelines should be separated off into their own articles. --mentallaxative 01:48, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

-- I agree. --Matthewbauer 17:16, 21 July 2009 (EDT)

-- done --shining 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)


What's the reason for using 'cp -r $_svnmod $_svnmod-build' instead of using 'svn export $_svnmod $_svnmod-build'?--BertiBoeller 19:21, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

-- no reason afaik. Please send a patch against /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD-svn.proto from abs package to the bug tracker. --shining 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)


Does the AUR still reject PKGBUILDs without a source=() and md5sum=() field? I don't think so - I have many PKGBUILDs up without them. Alex anthony 20:29, 12 August 2009 (EDT)

-- I updated the page accordingly. --shining 07:59, 4 October 2009 (EDT)