Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vim"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments)
(Advanced vim usage?)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Could a wise vim wizard share with us the art of advanced vim usage using plugins and commands not explained in this article?
 
Could a wise vim wizard share with us the art of advanced vim usage using plugins and commands not explained in this article?
 
--[[User:Svenstaro|Svenstaro]] 22:45, 19 August 2009 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Svenstaro|Svenstaro]] 22:45, 19 August 2009 (EDT)
 +
:I am not a wizard, but regardless, one of the things to do is simply peruse the [http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/quickref.html#quickref quickref] and try to think of when such and such command or keystroke could be useful. Read the associated documentation for those you are interested in. See also Jonathan McPherson's [http://jmcpherson.org/editing.html article on efficient editing] as well as [http://www.moolenaar.net/habits.html Bram Moolenar's version].
  
 
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==

Revision as of 02:21, 11 May 2011

Advanced vim usage?

Could a wise vim wizard share with us the art of advanced vim usage using plugins and commands not explained in this article? --Svenstaro 22:45, 19 August 2009 (EDT)

I am not a wizard, but regardless, one of the things to do is simply peruse the quickref and try to think of when such and such command or keystroke could be useful. Read the associated documentation for those you are interested in. See also Jonathan McPherson's article on efficient editing as well as Bram Moolenar's version.

Comments

"This is the basic usage on how to use vim" is a very awkward sentece. I've changed it.

Nod. How it is put now describes it better. --Gen2ly 15:39, 21 October 2009 (EDT)