Difference between revisions of "Talk:Window manager"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(List of window managers: re)
(List of window managers: re)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:Yup, unsupported means 'in the AUR'. I guess this way you can see which of them are in the AUR w/o mousing over the link to the package. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 15:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:Yup, unsupported means 'in the AUR'. I guess this way you can see which of them are in the AUR w/o mousing over the link to the package. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 15:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
::I've also noticed slight difference in font typesetting (it may be just my font config). Perhaps it would be better to change [[Template:AUR]] (or [[Template:Pkg]]) to make the difference explicit and unified. Either way, the listing in this section should be consistent with [[List of Applications]]. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 20:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
::I've also noticed slight difference in font typesetting (it may be just my font config). Perhaps it would be better to change [[Template:AUR]] (or [[Template:Pkg]]) to make the difference explicit and unified. Either way, the listing in this section should be consistent with [[List of Applications]]. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 20:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 +
:::Yes, please remove those tags; a discussion about differentiating templates Pkg and AUR was started long ago at the '''extreme end''' of [[Help talk:Style#Style vs. Usability]], every contribution is welcome :) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 02:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:39, 24 July 2013

List of window managers

What does '[unsupported]' mean in this context? That the package is from AUR and not from official repo? If yes, isn't that superfluous? -- Lahwaacz (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Yup, unsupported means 'in the AUR'. I guess this way you can see which of them are in the AUR w/o mousing over the link to the package. -- Karol (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I've also noticed slight difference in font typesetting (it may be just my font config). Perhaps it would be better to change Template:AUR (or Template:Pkg) to make the difference explicit and unified. Either way, the listing in this section should be consistent with List of Applications. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 20:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, please remove those tags; a discussion about differentiating templates Pkg and AUR was started long ago at the extreme end of Help talk:Style#Style vs. Usability, every contribution is welcome :) -- Kynikos (talk) 02:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)