Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wine"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(WINEARCH=win32)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Wine seems to treat empty folders as win64 prefix folders, making it confusing to create win32 prefixes in empty folders. It gives the error [wine: WINEARCH set to win32 but '/home/wine/photoshop' is a 64-bit installation].
 
Wine seems to treat empty folders as win64 prefix folders, making it confusing to create win32 prefixes in empty folders. It gives the error [wine: WINEARCH set to win32 but '/home/wine/photoshop' is a 64-bit installation].
Perhaps we should add a note about this? See this bugreport http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29661 -- [[User:JKAbrams]] 14:35, 20 Jan 2012 (EDT)
+
Perhaps we should add a note about this? See this bugreport http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29661 -- [[User:JKAbrams|JKAbrams]] 14:35, 20 Jan 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:43, 20 January 2012

bin32-wine vs. bin32-wine-suse?

Is there any noteworthy difference between these two, e. g. speed or stability? I couldn't find an answer to that. -- Misc 16:27, 9 May 2010 (EDT)

WINEARCH=win32

Wine seems to treat empty folders as win64 prefix folders, making it confusing to create win32 prefixes in empty folders. It gives the error [wine: WINEARCH set to win32 but '/home/wine/photoshop' is a 64-bit installation]. Perhaps we should add a note about this? See this bugreport http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29661 -- JKAbrams 14:35, 20 Jan 2012 (EDT)