Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wine"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Clarification: Remove closed topic.)
(Poor writing)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Poor writing ==
 
== Poor writing ==
 
Throughout the article, I see: a lack of grammar, repetitive or overly verbose statements, and overuse of the [note] tag.  Anyone else want to correct this? [[User:T1nk3r3r|T1nk3r3r]] ([[User talk:T1nk3r3r|talk]]) 22:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 
Throughout the article, I see: a lack of grammar, repetitive or overly verbose statements, and overuse of the [note] tag.  Anyone else want to correct this? [[User:T1nk3r3r|T1nk3r3r]] ([[User talk:T1nk3r3r|talk]]) 22:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 +
: Going to edit 'architectural differences' soon.  Too much information that is already stated elsewhere.  Not sure it even requires its own subheading. [[User:T1nk3r3r|T1nk3r3r]] ([[User talk:T1nk3r3r|talk]]) 02:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
  
 
== WINEARCH=win32 ==
 
== WINEARCH=win32 ==

Revision as of 02:49, 18 July 2012

Poor writing

Throughout the article, I see: a lack of grammar, repetitive or overly verbose statements, and overuse of the [note] tag. Anyone else want to correct this? T1nk3r3r (talk) 22:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Going to edit 'architectural differences' soon. Too much information that is already stated elsewhere. Not sure it even requires its own subheading. T1nk3r3r (talk) 02:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

WINEARCH=win32

Wine seems to treat empty folders as win64 prefix folders, making it confusing to create win32 prefixes in empty folders. It gives the error [wine: WINEARCH set to win32 but '/home/wine/photoshop' is a 64-bit installation]. Perhaps we should add a note about this? See this bugreport http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29661 -- JKAbrams 14:35, 20 Jan 2012 (EDT)

Yup, feel free to add that note. --Svenstaro 12:24, 20 January 2012 (EST)