Should links to AUR be edited when a package is available in the official repository? In this case
yubikey-personalization-gui. Not sure how to determine if the AUR link is just outdated or if the author is pointing to the AUR because there is a newer version which is needed for whatever he describes in his article.
--Eike (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- The link to the -git package is there since the article was created in 2011. A stable version was adopted into the community repo only recently, and nobody has ever updated the article. You can be the one to do it :) Yes, when there's an official package available, it's preferable to link to it, or even both versions so that users can choose for themselves. — Kynikos (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the paragraph PAM configuration: My
/etc/pam.d/ssh looks like this:
#%PAM-1.0 #auth required pam_securetty.so #disable remote root auth include system-remote-login account include system-remote-login password include system-remote-login session include system-remote-login}}