Difference between revisions of "Talk:ZFS"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add my comment about DKMS)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
::...or an [https://help.github.com/articles/about-gists/#anonymous-gists anonymous gist] if you don't have nor want to create a GitHub account. — [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 08:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 
::...or an [https://help.github.com/articles/about-gists/#anonymous-gists anonymous gist] if you don't have nor want to create a GitHub account. — [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 08:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Isn't that exactly what DKMS is doing? There DKMS packages in the AUR. [[User:Das j|Das j]] ([[User talk:Das j|talk]]) 20:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
  
 
== Automatic snapshots ==
 
== Automatic snapshots ==

Revision as of 20:02, 10 January 2016

Bindmount

Where does this file go and what other steps are required?

I would expect: /etc/systemd/system/

Then: systemctl enable srv-nfs4-media.mount

Msalerno (talk) 02:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

resume hook

In think in the page is a typo, the page should state resume hook instead of hibernate, but the limitation still applies. Can anyone confirm that the resume hook must appear before filesystems? Ezzetabi (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Automatic build script

I'm fine with deleting the scripts. I only posted it because graysky's script never worked for me. Long stuff like this would be useful if the ArchWiki featured roll-up text. Severach (talk) 10:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

I'd suggest to maintain it in a github repo. You get better versioning, syntax highlighting, cloning, etc. -- Alad (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
...or an anonymous gist if you don't have nor want to create a GitHub account. — Kynikos (talk) 08:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Isn't that exactly what DKMS is doing? There DKMS packages in the AUR. Das j (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Automatic snapshots

zfs-auto-snapshot-gitAUR seems to have disappeared from the AUR. I haven't been able to find any information on why it was deleted; does anyone know? In any case, it should probably be removed from this page. warai otoko (talk) 03:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

On further inspection, looks like it may have gotten lost in the transition to AUR4. It should be resubmitted if we want to continue recommending it here; I've found it useful, at any rate. Warai otoko (talk) 04:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I've recreated it. I use this script as well. --Chungy (talk) 02:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)