Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Merge"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Merge from: wording: response)
(Merge from: wording: feature removed, closed)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Merge from: wording==
+
==<s>Merge from: wording</s>==
 
Currently when using the template with {{ic|1=dir=from}} the resulting heading is "This article or section is a candidate for merging from Template:Merge." This sounds a bit weird, at least to me, is there anybody who can think of a phrasing that always sounds ok when changing the variable word "with/to/from"? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 09:25, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 
Currently when using the template with {{ic|1=dir=from}} the resulting heading is "This article or section is a candidate for merging from Template:Merge." This sounds a bit weird, at least to me, is there anybody who can think of a phrasing that always sounds ok when changing the variable word "with/to/from"? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 09:25, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
::You're right, it's not necessary, I've removed it now; also the 2nd "reason" argument can be used for specifying the direction. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:21, 20 March 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:21, 20 March 2012

Merge from: wording

Currently when using the template with dir=from the resulting heading is "This article or section is a candidate for merging from Template:Merge." This sounds a bit weird, at least to me, is there anybody who can think of a phrasing that always sounds ok when changing the variable word "with/to/from"? -- Kynikos 09:25, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- pointone 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
You're right, it's not necessary, I've removed it now; also the 2nd "reason" argument can be used for specifying the direction. -- Kynikos 08:21, 20 March 2012 (EDT)