Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Merge"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Merge from: wording: feature removed, closed)
(Merge from: wording)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
 
::You're right, it's not necessary, I've removed it now; also the 2nd "reason" argument can be used for specifying the direction. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:21, 20 March 2012 (EDT)
 
::You're right, it's not necessary, I've removed it now; also the 2nd "reason" argument can be used for specifying the direction. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:21, 20 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Template error ==
 +
The full url change has small error in [[E17_(%C4%8Cesky)]]. -- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 13:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:44, 4 June 2013

Merge from: wording

Currently when using the template with dir=from the resulting heading is "This article or section is a candidate for merging from Template:Merge." This sounds a bit weird, at least to me, is there anybody who can think of a phrasing that always sounds ok when changing the variable word "with/to/from"? -- Kynikos 09:25, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

I don't know if this kind of distinction is necessary; the intended destination/direction can and should be discussed in the specified discussion page. -- pointone 22:48, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
You're right, it's not necessary, I've removed it now; also the 2nd "reason" argument can be used for specifying the direction. -- Kynikos 08:21, 20 March 2012 (EDT)

Template error

The full url change has small error in E17_(Česky). -- Fengchao (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)