User talk:Ambrevar

From ArchWiki
Revision as of 18:41, 18 December 2013 by Karol (talk | contribs) (Games / Netbook Games: rm closed discussion)
Jump to: navigation, search


While I share your enthusiam, please avoid bias in articles without appropriate referencing. It almost sounds like a advertisement/opinion. Wikis should stick to the facts. T1nk3r3r (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

I agree we should stick to the truth, but opinion matters. In fact I just told the truth : radeon may perform better at 3D (it does for me). I encourage the use of radeon over catalyst because of the quality of the product, because it's much more Unix. It perfectly fits to the content of this wiki. By the way the "fact" Catalyst was better at 3D has never had appropriate references either. Arch Wiki is not an encyclopedia, it is written by people who believe in Unix, in the KISS philosophy, in the do-it-yourself way of handling thing, and so on. There is necessarily a lot of opinions down there. And sarcasms. See this quote from AMD Catalyst that appears two times in the article:
The Legacy driver does not support Xorg 1.13 for now. Support should be added by AMD in a century or two, but this could be sooner.
I discussed also about it with User:Unia who shares your point, so I decided to remove my changes and to start a discussion. --Ambrevar (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2013 (UTC)