Difference between revisions of "User talk:Graysky"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?: new section)
(Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?)
Line 81: Line 81:
 
== Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source? ==
 
== Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source? ==
  
UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from source code.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?
+
UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from source code.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck's binrary in your source?
 +
<br />
 
'''Thank you.'''
 
'''Thank you.'''
 +
 +
btw, the best is it has all platfrom like linux-ck.

Revision as of 12:14, 9 August 2012

Beginners' Guide update

Hi. You accidentally removed most of the content on the Beginners' Guide/Installation with these changes so I rolled it back. I was going to replace the old section on the page with yours, but I realized that the core install CD will still have to use the old rc.conf syntax before being updated. I kept your replacement section at Talk:Beginners' Guide/Installation for now (where we can figure out what to do). Not sure what a proper solution is, since the netinstall will have the new syntax (I think). thestinger 01:09, 4 July 2011 (EDT)

Hey. Was no accident. Good point about the ISO not reflecting the changes though. On the other hand, as soon as the user updates the system, these new changes will be affecting the system. Perhaps best to leave the new info in the guide with a note about a first update?
Please discuss that at Talk:Beginners' Guide/Installation. -- Kynikos 05:32, 5 July 2011 (EDT)
How do you get the date/time stamp on the wiki again?
You mean the signature, like 'thestinger 01:09, 4 July 2011 (EDT)'? Use '~~~~' (four tildas) -- Karol 17:45, 4 July 2011 (EDT)

Modprobed_db typo

The wiki does care if it's Modprobed_db or Modprobed-db - the latter page does not exist. I noticed this typo in your 'Favorite Wiki Pages to Which I Have Contributed' list. -- Karol 21:04, 31 December 2011 (EST)

Re: Modprobed_db typo

Good eye for detail. Fixed and thanks -- Graysky 08:24, 1 January 2012 (EST)

Command prompts

Hey, I've just undone this edit since it breaks style consistency: I think that we must make such choices globally, and not arbitrarily having some code with prompts and some other without. The current style guidelines mention the use of prompts, so this problem should be discussed in Help talk:Style first, agreed? :) -- Kynikos 12:14, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Re: Command prompts

Cool with me. I'll consider a discussion at style guidelines -- Graysky 12:25, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Edit summary

It's me again :) I appreciate what you're doing on the wiki, but, as you're one of the most active contributors, I'd like to ask you to use the Summary field in editor pages, just above the Save page button, to explain the what and why of your edits, since there are users like me who patrol the recent changes, and it's much more difficult and time consuming to check an unexplained edit than an explained one. See also Help:Style#Edit summary. Thank you for collaborating and for contributing! -- Kynikos 05:05, 10 February 2012 (EST)

EDIT: Well, you can make an exception for Linux-ck, since you're practically the only maintainer of the article. -- Kynikos 05:07, 10 February 2012 (EST)

You got it. Thank you for all the time that you put into making the wiki consistent :).-- Graysky 05:22, 10 February 2012 (EST)

Explanation request :)

...I know I'm annoying :) but can you answer ArchWiki:Reports#btrfs stable? and ArchWiki:Reports#/usr/lib/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf? Thanks -- Kynikos 17:26, 14 April 2012 (EDT)

No problem. Karol contacted me by email. I have responded on the reports page. Thx. Graysky 18:21, 14 April 2012 (EDT)

MPlayer Video Output Driver

You added 'vo' to the list of video output drivers, but according to my mplayer, vo isn't a driver:

> mplayer -vo help
MPlayer2 UNKNOWN (C) 2000-2012 MPlayer Team
Available video output drivers:
	vdpau	VDPAU with X11
	gl_nosw	OpenGL no software rendering
	x11	X11 ( XImage/Shm )
	xover	General X11 driver for overlay capable video output drivers
	sdl	SDL YUV/RGB/BGR renderer (SDL v1.1.7+ only!)
	gl	OpenGL
	gl_sdl	OpenGL with SDL
	dga	DGA ( Direct Graphic Access V2.0 )
	fbdev	Framebuffer Device
	fbdev2	Framebuffer Device
	aa	AAlib
	caca	libcaca
	v4l2	V4L2 MPEG Video Decoder Output
	null	Null video output
	mpegpes	MPEG-PES to DVB card
	yuv4mpeg	yuv4mpeg output for mjpegtools
	png	PNG file
	jpeg	JPEG file
	gif89a	animated GIF output
	tga	Targa output
	pnm	PPM/PGM/PGMYUV file
	md5sum	md5sum of each frame

162 audio & 361 video codecs

Smarthound 17:16, 22 April 2012 (EDT)

My bad. FixedGraysky 19:22, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
I don't know - you've changed it to 'vx'. I've never heard of vx before, but I have heard of xv (even though it isn't in my list). Anyhow, this is in the section about enabling VDPAU, and I don't see how adding xv helps with that, when the line already ends with a comma. Is vx in the Nvidia documentation somewhere? Smarthound 19:30, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
Wow, I got that ass-backwards. It's actually xv which is the X11/Xv which should be the fallback method should none of the vdpau drivers work on the target video. If you feel that I added that in error, please edit back to the form you feel is right. I am not 100 % certain the 2nd method is needed. Graysky 19:39, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
$ mplayer -vo help
MPlayer SVN-r34799-4.6.3 (C) 2000-2012 MPlayer Team
183 audio & 398 video codecs
Available video output drivers:
	vdpau	VDPAU with X11
	xv	X11/Xv
         ...

Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?

UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from source code.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck's binrary in your source?
Thank you.

btw, the best is it has all platfrom like linux-ck.