Difference between revisions of "User talk:Graysky"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with "== <s>Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?</s> ==")
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== <s>Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?</s> ==
== <s>Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?</s> ==
UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from AUR.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck's binrary in your source?
<br />
'''Thank you.'''
btw, the best is it has all platfrom like linux-ck. --[[User:Tuxzz|Tuxzz]] ([[User talk:Tuxzz|talk]]) 03:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Sorry dude, no interest in maintaining that patchset.  I tried once before. [[User:Graysky|Graysky]] ([[User talk:Graysky|talk]]) 20:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh,It's tooooooo bad. --[[User:Tuxzz|Tuxzz]] ([[User talk:Tuxzz|talk]]) 03:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
:I went ahead and stroke this section out, meaning the discussion is closed.
:<s>BTW, this page is getting a bit cluttered with stuff that's been long-fixed or discussed. It's your discussion page, graysky, so I won't blank it in case you prefer to keep it as it is now.</s> -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 21:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
== linux-ck-p4 is not stable. ==
My cpu is P4 3.0G with HT.But linux-ck-p4 in my computer is not stable. It's usually crash. I don't know why. But I use linux-ck compile by myself is stable.<br />
Do you know why, guy? --[[User:Tuxzz|Tuxzz]] ([[User talk:Tuxzz|talk]]) 11:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Since I do not have one to test myself, I will post the kernel .config that I use to build the repo package.  Please use it to build one yourself and test for stability.  If there is a problem, since yo u can run one you compile yourself, the cause should be in there.  Can you run the generic i686 package without stability issues?
[[User:Graysky|Graysky]] ([[User talk:Graysky|talk]]) 14:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I can. --[[User:Tuxzz|Tuxzz]] ([[User talk:Tuxzz|talk]]) 13:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Post the output of:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
[[User:Graysky|Graysky]] ([[User talk:Graysky|talk]]) 15:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
[tuxzz@TukuZaZa ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
  processor : 0
  vendor_id : GenuineIntel
  cpu family : 15
  model : 2
  model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
  stepping : 9
  microcode : 0x14
  cpu MHz : 3000.161
--[[User:Tuxzz|Tuxzz]] ([[User talk:Tuxzz|talk]]) 05:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
The package I am providing should be fine.  Per the nconfig help:
Select this for Intel Pentium 4 chips.  This includes the Pentium 4, Pentium D, P4-based Celeron and Xeon, and Pentium-4 M (not Pentium M) chips. 
This option enables compile flags optimized for the chip, uses the correct cache line size, and applies any applicable optimizations.
CPUIDs: F[0-6][1-A] (in /proc/cpuinfo show = cpu family : 15 )
I do not know why when you compile it there are no problems.  Best I can do is offer to compare your .config to mine.
# Download the current package and enable the nconfig option
# makepkg -s and customize for your cpu
# Once the build starts post the src/linux-3.5/.config to pastebin and link it here
[[User:Graysky|Graysky]] ([[User talk:Graysky|talk]]) 13:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:53, 22 December 2012

Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?