Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?
UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from AUR.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck's binrary in your source?
Sorry dude, no interest in maintaining that patchset. I tried once before. Graysky (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- I went ahead and stroke this section out, meaning the discussion is closed.
BTW, this page is getting a bit cluttered with stuff that's been long-fixed or discussed. It's your discussion page, graysky, so I won't blank it in case you prefer to keep it as it is now.-- Karol (talk) 21:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
linux-ck-p4 is not stable.
My cpu is P4 3.0G with HT.But linux-ck-p4 in my computer is not stable. It's usually crash. I don't know why. But I use linux-ck compile by myself is stable.
Do you know why, guy? --Tuxzz (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Since I do not have one to test myself, I will post the kernel .config that I use to build the repo package. Please use it to build one yourself and test for stability. If there is a problem, since yo u can run one you compile yourself, the cause should be in there. Can you run the generic i686 package without stability issues?
Graysky (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Post the output of:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Graysky (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)