Could you add linux-uksm-ck in your source?
UKSM is very good for old computer.But I won't build linux kernel from AUR.It's toooooooooo slow.Could you add linux-uksm-ck's binrary in your source?
- I went ahead and stroke this section out, meaning the discussion is closed.
BTW, this page is getting a bit cluttered with stuff that's been long-fixed or discussed. It's your discussion page, graysky, so I won't blank it in case you prefer to keep it as it is now.-- Karol (talk) 21:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
linux-ck-p4 is not stable.
My cpu is P4 3.0G with HT.But linux-ck-p4 in my computer is not stable. It's usually crash. I don't know why. But I use linux-ck compile by myself is stable.
Do you know why, guy? --Tuxzz (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Since I do not have one to test myself, I will post the kernel .config that I use to build the repo package. Please use it to build one yourself and test for stability. If there is a problem, since yo u can run one you compile yourself, the cause should be in there. Can you run the generic i686 package without stability issues?
Post the output of:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
[tuxzz@TukuZaZa ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping : 9 microcode : 0x14 cpu MHz : 3000.161
I am assuming that you are running this on i686? If so, then the package I am providing should be fine. Per the nconfig help:
Select this for Intel Pentium 4 chips. This includes the Pentium 4, Pentium D, P4-based Celeron and Xeon, and Pentium-4 M (not Pentium M) chips. This option enables compile flags optimized for the chip, uses the correct cache line size, and applies any applicable optimizations. CPUIDs: F[0-6][1-A] (in /proc/cpuinfo show = cpu family : 15 )
If you are using the x86_64 packages then it is not right per the same help. I do not know why when you compile it there are no problems.