Difference between revisions of "User talk:Idomeneo1"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(What have you done to the wpa_supplicant article?: new section)
 
(What have you done to the wpa_supplicant article?)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
-- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 19:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 
-- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 19:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:If the user is supposed to specially create their own file /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf file, the article does not make any mention of this necessity. If this is true, then add that information, and update as needed.
 +
:The [[wpa_supplicant]] article is an unreadable mess, and I am trying to make it less of a mess. I doubt my other edits have gone unchecked by you, given that you've so quickly pounced on this.
 +
:Don't dismiss other editors as "bullshit". I expect this kind of trolling is how the article got into the state it's in.
 +
:[[User:Idomeneo1|Idomeneo1]] ([[User talk:Idomeneo1|talk]]) 19:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:42, 6 February 2014

What have you done to the wpa_supplicant article?

As I'm a little short on time these days, I'll comment only on the two latest edits: [1], [2].

The default location for the dhcpcd's wpa_supplicant hook is /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf, not /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf (look at /usr/lib/dhcpcd/dhcpcd-hooks/10-wpa_supplicant, line 6). The second edit confirms that this was not an overlook, so I must ask where did you get this bullshit? I hope that the other edits I did not check (yet) are of much better quality.

Seeing that you changed the default config path across the entire article, I must point out that the path /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf was given intentionally - the user should not edit the bloated /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf provided by wpa_supplicant, and instead create a small, tailored config file - the path here does not really matter, since /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf is used as default by multiple networking managers ArchWiki just re-used this path.

-- Lahwaacz (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

If the user is supposed to specially create their own file /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf file, the article does not make any mention of this necessity. If this is true, then add that information, and update as needed.
The wpa_supplicant article is an unreadable mess, and I am trying to make it less of a mess. I doubt my other edits have gone unchecked by you, given that you've so quickly pounced on this.
Don't dismiss other editors as "bullshit". I expect this kind of trolling is how the article got into the state it's in.
Idomeneo1 (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)