Difference between revisions of "User talk:Louipc"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(http to https AUR links change: stupid bot - or not?)
(Stupid bot - or not?: rm closed discussion)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Hi Loui. I believe the standard page should remain protected. However, I've did most changes suggested. The ones I didn't do were the ones I wasn't really sure about, didn't think they should be done or were just nitpick. [[User:Snowman|Snowman]]
 
Hi Loui. I believe the standard page should remain protected. However, I've did most changes suggested. The ones I didn't do were the ones I wasn't really sure about, didn't think they should be done or were just nitpick. [[User:Snowman|Snowman]]
 
:I'd say that kind of defeats the purpose of a wiki, but if you want to make the edits I guess that works. Thanks for your work. - [[User:Louipc|louipc]] 23:13, 2 January 2011 (EST)
 
:I'd say that kind of defeats the purpose of a wiki, but if you want to make the edits I guess that works. Thanks for your work. - [[User:Louipc|louipc]] 23:13, 2 January 2011 (EST)
 
 
==Stupid bot - or not?==
 
Why do you prefer to keep using http links for the AUR? If you use http, you cannot post comments or even log in: "HTTP login is disabled. Please switch to HTTPs if you want to login." -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 18:22, 24 March 2012 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 15:15, 8 November 2012

Hi Loui. I believe the standard page should remain protected. However, I've did most changes suggested. The ones I didn't do were the ones I wasn't really sure about, didn't think they should be done or were just nitpick. Snowman

I'd say that kind of defeats the purpose of a wiki, but if you want to make the edits I guess that works. Thanks for your work. - louipc 23:13, 2 January 2011 (EST)