Difference between revisions of "User talk:Marcvangend"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (libreoffice: typo)
(libreoffice)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:Hi Alad. No, I did not try that ''before'' removing the file, because I found that solution first. I decided to add it to the wiki for completeness' sake. I did also try the theming solution, which worked fine for me and seems like a cleaner solution. I did not file a bug report because this is merely a new workaround for a known bug. Can you explain why you added the flag for accuracy? The information I added is completely correct and tested. [[User:Marcvangend|Marcvangend]] ([[User talk:Marcvangend|talk]]) 18:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 
:Hi Alad. No, I did not try that ''before'' removing the file, because I found that solution first. I decided to add it to the wiki for completeness' sake. I did also try the theming solution, which worked fine for me and seems like a cleaner solution. I did not file a bug report because this is merely a new workaround for a known bug. Can you explain why you added the flag for accuracy? The information I added is completely correct and tested. [[User:Marcvangend|Marcvangend]] ([[User talk:Marcvangend|talk]]) 18:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 
::Thanks. Simply removing files from packages is not "correct", especially when a better workaround is available. I've left in the file name, if people want to remove it they can do so. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 18:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 
::Thanks. Simply removing files from packages is not "correct", especially when a better workaround is available. I've left in the file name, if people want to remove it they can do so. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 18:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 +
:::Sure, I'm okay with that. There is no arguing that removing files from packages it not correct :-) [[User:Marcvangend|Marcvangend]] ([[User talk:Marcvangend|talk]]) 18:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:21, 29 October 2015

libreoffice

Hi, did you try LibreOffice#Theme before removing libvclplug_gtk3lo.so? [1] Also, have you opened a ticket on https://bugs.archlinux.org ? Cheers -- Alad (talk) 17:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Alad. No, I did not try that before removing the file, because I found that solution first. I decided to add it to the wiki for completeness' sake. I did also try the theming solution, which worked fine for me and seems like a cleaner solution. I did not file a bug report because this is merely a new workaround for a known bug. Can you explain why you added the flag for accuracy? The information I added is completely correct and tested. Marcvangend (talk) 18:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Simply removing files from packages is not "correct", especially when a better workaround is available. I've left in the file name, if people want to remove it they can do so. -- Alad (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Sure, I'm okay with that. There is no arguing that removing files from packages it not correct :-) Marcvangend (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)