Difference between revisions of "User talk:Misfit138/The Arch Way v2.0"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Inspired by 'The Rise of Worse is Better'?: re)
(Inspired by 'The Rise of Worse is Better'?: re)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::I think the way 'The Arch Way v2.0' is written closely resembles 'The Rise of "Worse is Better"' and since it was written later, I assume it could have been inspired by it.
 
::I think the way 'The Arch Way v2.0' is written closely resembles 'The Rise of "Worse is Better"' and since it was written later, I assume it could have been inspired by it.
 
::-- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 07:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::-- [[User:Karol|Karol]] ([[User talk:Karol|talk]]) 07:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::Cool, thanks for explaining, maybe we can add:
 +
::::''Inspired by [http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html The Rise of "Worse is Better"].''
 +
:::at the top, before the ToC?
 +
:::An alternative would be a See also section I guess, but for some reason I like it less.
 +
:::-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 12:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:22, 13 November 2012

Inspired by 'The Rise of Worse is Better'?

Can we add that it's inspired by http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html? -- Karol (talk) 21:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Pardon my ignorance, but where/how did you find this reference? -- Kynikos (talk) 15:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
I remembered reading this article years ago when I was familiarizing myself with who's who of computing. I googled 'Worse is better', found out there's even a Wikipedia article about it, picked the link to Jamie Zawinski website and here it is :-)
I think the way 'The Arch Way v2.0' is written closely resembles 'The Rise of "Worse is Better"' and since it was written later, I assume it could have been inspired by it.
-- Karol (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for explaining, maybe we can add:
Inspired by The Rise of "Worse is Better".
at the top, before the ToC?
An alternative would be a See also section I guess, but for some reason I like it less.
-- Kynikos (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)