Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pithdillinja"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Double redirects: re:alexanderR)
m (Double redirects)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::(deletion was completed)--[[User:Pithdillinja|Pithdillinja]] ([[User talk:Pithdillinja|talk]]) 21:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 
::(deletion was completed)--[[User:Pithdillinja|Pithdillinja]] ([[User talk:Pithdillinja|talk]]) 21:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:::Sorry, but it appears that one double redirect still exists. --[[User:AlexanderR|AlexanderR]] ([[User talk:AlexanderR|talk]])
 
:::Sorry, but it appears that one double redirect still exists. --[[User:AlexanderR|AlexanderR]] ([[User talk:AlexanderR|talk]])
::::Ha! How about that. I had the name changed and anothe redirect was made with it. Now it is fixed for sure. Thanks for letting me know. -- [[User:Pithdillinja|Pithdillinja]] ([[User talk:Pithdillinja|talk]]) 06:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
+
::::Ha! How about that. I had the name changed and another redirect was made with it. Now it is fixed for sure. Thanks for letting me know. -- [[User:Pithdillinja|Pithdillinja]] ([[User talk:Pithdillinja|talk]]) 06:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:39, 9 June 2012

Double redirects

Moving page 2 times in row (like you did with Dialup Access) is a common mistake, which leads to creation of double redirects. To avoid this check Special:DoubleRedirects after every page move. --AlexanderR (talk).

Thanks AlexanderR. I have removed the redirects, and I have flagged it for deletion. I suppose we just wait until an admin comes by and deletes it now? --Pithdillinja (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
(deletion was completed)--Pithdillinja (talk) 21:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but it appears that one double redirect still exists. --AlexanderR (talk)
Ha! How about that. I had the name changed and another redirect was made with it. Now it is fixed for sure. Thanks for letting me know. -- Pithdillinja (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)