User talk:M0p

From ArchWiki
Latest comment: 3 June 2021 by Dragonwater in topic 关于 Fcitx5_(简体中文)#fcitx5_与_sway

Out of curiosity, why did you switch from btrfs to zfs so quickly? Did you encounter any major issues with btrfs?

Ceri (talk) 13:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, I didn't encounter any issue during the brief period of using root on btrfs. Originally I started with root on btrfs because it has in-kernel support and the installation is relatively simple. Just look at those workarounds to get ZFS booted with GRUB!
But later I decided to switch to root on ZFS because it 1. is more actively developed, 2. has more features, 3. is more stable.
Regarding btrfs, 1. there are some horror stories in which users lost data, 2. lots of gotchas in daily usage [1], one of them is that creating subvols will slow down the filesystem [2]. With ZFS I can create as many datasets or snapshots as I want.
Also booting an alternate root filesystem with btrfs is also more difficult, involving hacking overlayfs into initramfs.
Kudos to the developers of btrfs and zfs, but as an end user, the experience should be as trouble-free as possible. Under this principle, the more battle-tested zfs is the way to go. M0p (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

关于 Fcitx5_(简体中文)#fcitx5_与_sway

我看到您在 [3] 中的更改摘要为“fcitx5 on pure wayland”。但内容似乎与 wayland 无关。如果是阐述如何配置一个特定的环境,我认为更适合放在一个博客文章上而不是放在 Fcitx5 (简体中文)。而且部分内容与 wiki 原内容重复。如果有时间的话希望能再仔细斟酌一下 Fcitx5_(简体中文)#fcitx5_与_sway 的内容

没事,你要是觉得多余就删了吧。我无所谓。内容上的确是重复的。M0p (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
好的,感谢回复 Dragonwater (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply