badblocks is a program to test storage devices for bad blocks.
S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology) is featured in almost every HDD still in use nowadays, and in some cases it can automatically retire defective HDD sectors. However, S.M.A.R.T. only passively waits for errors while badblocks can actively write simple patterns to every block of a device and then check them, searching for damaged areas (Just like memtest86* does with RAM).
This can be done in a destructive write-mode that effectively wipes the device (do backup!) or in non-destructive read-write (backup advisable as well!) and read-only modes.
- 1 Installation
- 2 Storage device fidelity
- 3 Comparisons with other programs
- 4 Testing for bad sectors
- 5 Have filesystem incorporate bad sectors
- 6 Finding bad sectors
Install the package.
Seefor the usage.
Storage device fidelity
Although there is no firm rule, it is common thinking that a new drive should have zero bad sectors. Over time, bad sectors will develop and although they are able to be defined to the file system so that they are avoided, continual use of the drive will usually result in additional bad sectors forming and it is usually the harbinger of its eventual death. Replacing the device is recommended.
Comparisons with other programs
Typical recommended practice for testing a storage device for bad sectors is to use the manufacturer's testing program. Most manufacturers have programs that do this. The main reasoning for this is that manufacturers usually have their standards built into the test programs that will tell you if the drive needs to be replaced or not. The caveat here being is that some manufacturers testing programs do not print full test results and allow a certain number of bad sectors saying only if they pass or not. Manufacturer programs, however, are generally quicker than badblocks sometimes a fair amount so.
Testing for bad sectors
To test for bad sectors in Linux the program badblocks is typically used. badblocks has several different modes to be able to detect bad sectors.
Read-write test (warning: destructive)
This test is primarily for testing new drives and is a read-write test. As the pattern is written to every accessible block, the device effectively gets wiped. The default is an extensive test with four passes using four different patterns: 0xaa (10101010), 0x55 (01010101), 0xff (11111111) and 0x00 (00000000). For some devices this will take a couple of days to complete.
# badblocks -wsv /dev/device
Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode From block 0 to 488386583 Testing with pattern 0xaa: done Reading and comparing: done Testing with pattern 0x55: done Reading and comparing: done Testing with pattern 0xff: 22.93% done, 4:09:55 elapsed. (0/0/0 errors) [...] Testing with pattern 0x00: done Reading and comparing: done Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. (0/0/0 errors)
-w: do a destructive write test
-s: show progress
-v: be "verbose" and output bad sectors detected to stdout
Additional options you might consider:
-b number: specify the block size of the hard disk which can significantly improve testing time. (
tune2fs -l partitionas the root user)
-p number: run through the extensive four pass test number of sequent iterations
-o /path/to/output-file: print bad sectors to output-file instead of stdout
-t test_pattern: Specify a pattern. See below.
Define specific test pattern
From the manpage: "The test_pattern may either be a numeric value between 0 and ULONG_MAX-1 inclusive [...]."
Badblocks can be made to repeatedly write a single "random pattern" with the
-t random option.
# badblocks -wsv -t random /dev/device
Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode From block 0 to 488386583 Testing with random pattern: done Reading and comparing: done Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. (0/0/0 errors)
Read-write test (non-destructive)
This test is designed for devices with data already on them. A non-destructive read-write test makes a backup of the original content of a sector before testing with a single random pattern and then restoring the content from the backup. This is a single pass test and is useful as a general maintenance test.
# badblocks -nsv /dev/device
Checking for bad blocks in non-destructive read-write mode From block 0 to 488386583 Checking for bad blocks (non-destructive read-write test) Testing with random pattern: done Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. (0/0/0 errors)
-n option signifies a non-destructive read-write test.
Have filesystem incorporate bad sectors
To not use bad sectors they have to be known by the filesystem.
During filesystem check
Incorporating bad sectors can be done using the filesystem check utility (
fsck can be told to use badblocks during a check. To do a read-write (non-destructive) test and have the bad sectors made known to the filesystem run:
# fsck -vcck /dev/device-PARTITION
-cc option tells run
fsck in non-destructive test mode, the
fsck to show its output, and the
-k option preserves old bad sectors that were detected.
To do a read-only test (not recommended):
# fsck -vck /dev/device-PARTITION
Before filesystem creation
Alternately, this can be done before filesystem creation.
If badblocks is run without the
-o option bad sectors will only be printed to stdout.
Example output for read errors in the beginning of the disk:
# badblocks -wsv /dev/drive
[...] Testing with pattern 0xff: done Reading and comparing: [...] 37584 37585 0.84% done, 7:31:08 elapsed. (0/0/527405 errors) 37586 [...] done Testing with pattern 0x00: Reading and comparing: [...] 37584 37585 [...] done Pass completed, 527405 bad blocks found. (0/0/527405 errors)
For comfortably passing badblocks error output to the filesystem it has to be written to a file.
# badblocks -wsv -o /root/badblocks.txt /dev/device
Checking for bad blocks in read-write mode From block 0 to 488386583 Testing with pattern 0xaa: done Reading and comparing: 6.36% done, 0:51 elapsed. (0/0/14713 errors) [...] Testing with pattern 0x00: done Reading and comparing: done Pass completed, 527405 bad blocks found. (0/0/527405 errors)
Then (re-)create the file system with the information:
# mkfs.filesystem-type -l /root/badblocks.txt /dev/device
0/0/527405errors is number_of_read_errors / number_of_write_errors / number_of_corruption_errors.
From themanual page:
- Note that the block numbers in the bad block list must be generated using the same block size as used by mke2fs. As a result, the
-coption to mke2fs is a much simpler and less error-prone method of checking a disk for bad blocks before formatting it.
So the recommended method is to use:
# mkfs.ext4 -c /dev/device
-cc to do a read-write bad block test.
First find the file systems block size. For example for ext# filesystems:
# dumpe2fs /dev/device-PARTITION | grep 'Block size'
Feed this to badblocks:
# badblocks -b block size
Finding bad sectors
You can use badblock to find bad sectors. Note that badblocks calls sectors "blocks". It supports a few scan modes. There is read-only mode (default) which is the least accurate. There is the destructive write-mode (
-w option) which is the most accurate but takes longer and will (obviously) destroy all data on the drive, thus making it quite useless for matching sectors up to files. There is finally the non-destructive read-write mode which is probably as accurate as the destructive mode, with the only real downside that it is probably the slowest. However, if a drive is known to be failing then read-only mode is probably still the safest.
To do a verbose (
-v option), read-only scan, run one of these commands (with
x being the drive letter and
y being partition number you want to scan):
Whole disk scan:
# badblocks -v /dev/sdx
Single partition scan:
# badblocks -v /dev/sdxy
The downside to scanning the drive as a whole is that each filesystem is going to start its block count relative to the partition it's on. This means that if you have a bad block that happens to be on, let's say, the second partition, and that partition starts on block 1000, then you will have to subtract 1000 from your block number in order to get the number you want. So if a scan from the beginning of the disk results in block number 1005 being bad, then block 5 of the second partition is what you'll actually be using.
Otherwise, if you've found bad blocks after doing a full scan, you can simply figure out which partitions they're on, and rescan those in order to get the block number, rather than do any block math.
Another thing to note is that badblocks defaults to 1024 byte blocks so you will either have to change the default size with the
-b option in order to match your filesystem or manually convert the block number(s) later.
If you need to figure out where your partitions start and end run fdisk.
-uoption will change the default unit to sectors).
Make sure to note the block size fdisk is using so that you can convert the block counts to match your scan.
# fdisk -l /dev/sdx
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, total 312581808 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000
After all this, you should have the block number(s) of your bad block(s), relative to the partition they exist on.