Talk:Ruby on Rails

propose a change: Puma is actually production-ready

Ruby on Rails#Application servers mentioned that

The built-in Ruby On Rails HTTP server (called Puma) is convenient for basic development, but it is not recommended for production use. Instead, you should use an application server such as…

This is wrong. This judgement was probably there for WEBrick, back when WEBrick was the default server for Rails (because WEBrick comes with Ruby). I’d like to change this into something like “Puma is the default; if you like, you can use an alternative application servers such as…”. Franklin Yu (talk) 08:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)