Talk:Official repositories

Add context about package ecosystem

I recently had the content below reverted.

The justification was: "AUR does not belong to the description of *official* repositories"

It's unclear what the issue here is. Is the sentence ambiguous somehow? I'm not insinuating in any way that AUR is *official*, and surely the big red warning on top of the AUR page is sufficient to make that clear. People generally mention pacman and (whether through yay or paru) AUR in one breath, and collectively they do represent the Arch package ecosystem as described. I'm happy to rephrase it if the content is unclear. This context is valuable information to include here for people wanting to understand the state of Arch packaging at a glance. Einr (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Reverted content

Combined with the AUR, Arch is proud to be home to one of the largest and most up-to-date package repository ecosystems in the Linux world.

This is why you should discuss in the Talk page before editing. Jasonwryan (talk) 07:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)