Talk:Pacman/Tips and tricks

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Leading slash

Pacman/Tips_and_tricks#aria2 doesn't work without leading slash, i.e. -d / turning file names to //var/cache/.... The article mentions this, but it doesn't mention why. -- Alad (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You would have to go way back to track this. It seems to have worked without -d / even in 2006: [1], [2]. I guess that simply nobody asked the right question... -- Lahwaacz (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Oops, it does not work without -d /. Then the problem must be on aria's side, which expects a file name for the -o option, which is then catenated with -d into the full path. Assuming that -d defaults to the cwd, /var/cache/ would appear twice in the result. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 12:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

pacman cache

I still think we should warn people not to symlink /var or anything under it. It leaves the whole system unusable because if the cache disappears during a pacman transaction, you're left with missing /usr/lib libraries, and nothing works, including pacman itself. This is a serious enough problem that it can take hours to figure out how to recover. If the wiki had mentioned this problem it would have saved me a lot of time and effort, and I'm not the only one who has run in to this. It is not, however, considered a bug. See https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50298. JimRees (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

This revisions says that: [3]. But to make it more clear: [4] -- Rdeckard (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I undid my change since I think that first change is more accurate (mentioning /var/cache/pacman/pkg and ancestors), so I went back to that but explicitly mentioned /var as an example. -- Rdeckard (talk) 01:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the background information. I was not aware of the bug report and now clearly understand why you altered the section the way you did. I hope the recent change is sufficient for you. Since every misbehaving program might leave a system unbootable if it plays a role in the boot process, it should be unnecessary to add this redundant information. However the problem you described is still severe and I hope you agree that the recent edits made to the article do the topic justice. Thanks for clarifying the topic and adding this to the article and sorry for reverting your edits at first. -- Edh (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

local repository database extension/compression recomendation

If you opt to not compress a pacman database, the files database can become very large, 10x larger than a gzipped one in my case, which cause issues when trying to update the local pacman files db (pacman -Fy) since apparently there is a max (expected) size. Should we include a warning about uncompressed databases?

—This unsigned comment is by JoshH100 (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2019‎. Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Use a new nginx.conf for Dynamic reverse proxy cache using nginx

I propose to replace the current nginx.conf with an improved nginx.conf and update the section. The new config doesn't make the upstream servers directly available on the network and it allows having mirrors with different relative paths to package files. It also removes directives that are not needed and has some other minor cleanups. I've been using a similar config for a few months now without any problems, so I believe it should be fine. Noctavian (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

What do you mean by "The new config doesn't make the upstream servers directly available on the network"? -- Lahwaacz (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
In the new config the server blocks for the upstream mirrors are set to listen to 127.0.0.1:800X. Only the computer that is running the nginx cache can send requests to 127.0.0.1. Other computers on the network can't. The current config exposes the upstream mirrors to the network, a nmap scan will show the 8080 port of the cache as open and the ports 8001, 8002, 8003 of the upstream mirrors as open. One can browse to cache.domain.example:8002 and have direct access to whatever package mirror website is used by the cache bypassing the cache config order and locations. The upstream mirrors don't need to be available to the entire network for the cache to work; they only need to be available to the computer that is hosting the nginx cache. I believe ports should not be left open on the network if they don't have to be open. Noctavian (talk) 08:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I have written a draft for the section update on my user page. I made some small changes to the config file since last week, added comments and mirror examples and turned off IPv6 address resolution to prevent some errors that can happen sometimes. Suggestions.are welcome. I haven't seen objections to my proposal, so I'm going to wait a few more days for feedback and then update the section on the main page with my draft and the new nginx.conf file if that's ok. Noctavian (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Feel free to go ahead. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Definition of virtual package

Regarding undoing revision 624446. I have found such a term in PKGBUILD article. I was specifically thinking about opencl-driver virtual package, but I did not mentioned that, to be more generic. Lahwaacz, what do you think? Maybe it is better to introduce virtual package term in the Pacman article, and reapply my edit? Ashark (talk) 20:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, it should have a proper definition instead of "definition" by example. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 06:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Please, take a look: Pacman#Virtual_packages. Ashark (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
It's a good start, thanks. I made a small change: [5] -- Lahwaacz (talk) 17:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Warning about listing changed backup files

I understand it's obvious the command doesn't track files not owned by any packages. But the introduction to that part is about backup up your /etc folder. Hence it is innacurate that this command suffice to list the modified files in /etc, because you (or a package from the AUR) might have created some new files. Shouldn't there be a mention about this inaccuracy ? Apollo22 (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2020‎ (UTC)

No, it is about backup files specified in the PKGBUILD. It is obvious from the definition that such files must be tracked by pacman. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 18:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
So it should be considered a bug if those folders are not in the PKGBUILD backup ? There seems to be some important packages that do not list those files correctly (for example systemd doesn't list /etc/systemd/system, or pacman /etc/pacman.d/hooks). This seems like a risky method to backup your /etc folder.
Apollo22 (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
It's not a bug - the backup array makes sense only for files owned by the package. You are completely missing the point of the backup field - it has nothing to do with System backup. Please read PKGBUILD#backup. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I think I better understand what the backup in the PKGBUILD means. But when the part begins with `If you want to back up your system configuration files`, shouldn't it be expected that the part explains a method to backup your system configuration files, not just the ones specified in the backup fields of the PKGBUILD ?
Apollo22 (talk)
I've added an accuracy flag, maybe somebody can clear up the introduction. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 07:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)