Talk:Getting involved

From ArchWiki
Latest comment: 21 January by Erus Iluvatar in topic Remove references to arch-women

Title/description format for Unofficial projects

After adding some bullets to Getting_involved#Unofficial_projects, I found myself repeating the same description over and over. Maybe someone could think of a few descriptions that actually add something. Otherwise, I'd suggest finding a different format for that section. -- Alad (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remove references to arch-women

Hey, yall!

Contrary to everything else listed in the arch-women user group looks pretty much dead:

Basically I don't see anyone being active there for quite a long time and thats why I thought we might aswell remove it. Would be good to get some +1/-1 before actually doing the edit. -- Gromit (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And the last two are basically advertising other communities. What about the mailing list, could it be archived? I think it'd be weird having a mailing list for a community that isn't referenced in the wiki. Levitating (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We could definitely archive the Classroom wiki page. — Lahwaacz (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I feel kinda weird removing a reference without the people directly involved having a word about it, but on the other hand if no one is there to say anything, no sense in keeping dead links.
-- Erus Iluvatar (talk) 14:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]