Talk:Power management
Sleep hooks
Where is the exact difference between Suspend/resume service files approach and Hooks in /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep?
Is the latter obsolete?
-- Orschiro 07:33, 17 January 2014
- From
systemd-sleep(8)
:- "Note that scripts or binaries dropped in
/usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep/
are intended for local use only and should be considered hacks."
- "Note that scripts or binaries dropped in
- It's always preferred to use service files, they are much more flexible in handling the dependencies etc.
- -- Lahwaacz (talk) 23:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Resume file does not work after resuming from hibernation
The systemd unit User resume actions
presented on this page only worked for me after resuming from sleep, not from hibernate.
After adding hibernate.target
to the After
and WantedBy
lines it works both ways.
However this is the first time I've done anything with such service files so I ain't sure if this is the optimal way.
Can anyone confirm?
—This unsigned comment is by PhilippD (talk) 18:30, 12 October 2015. Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
- Actually, the
suspend@.service
in Power_management#Suspend.2Fresume_service_files binds tosleep.target
, butresume@.service
binds tosuspend.target
. They are not synonyms, systemd triggerssuspend.target
andsleep.target
when the system is suspended to RAM, andhibernate.target
andsleep.target
when it is suspended to disk. This way you can bind your service to either one or both suspend methods using just a single target. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 19:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Bluetooth rfkill
Systemd now provides systemd-rfkill.service
. If you use rfkill block
to disable bluetooth, systemd-rfkill.service
will remember this and restore this state on next boot -- robtaylor (talk) Wed 18 May 16:10:05 BST 2016
A "sensible value" for the laptop mode
The vast amount of specific information carried in this part, I find it a bit surprising. It seems "A sensible value for the laptop mode 'knob' is 5 seconds." could be heard in the mouth of a politician kicking the ball into touch.
From Documentation/laptops/laptop-mode.txt:
> The value of the laptop_mode knob determines the time between the occurrence of disk I/O and when the flush is triggered. A sensible value for the knob is 5 seconds. Setting the knob to 0 disables laptop mode.
So "5 (seconds)" is related to the virtual memory subsystem (in direct relation to vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs). Then "0" turns laptop mode off, aha. It'd be cool to know *what* is laptop_mode is in the first place: Is it the whole vm configuration settings that are described in the docs? I believe not, as e.g. the conf files are not to be seen in present Arch (nor in other distros I know of).
A few things changed a bit since the Documentation/laptops/laptop-mode.txt was last edited, in 2004. I've searched extensively which part of it might still be up to date, without success so far. TLP has many if not most of the settings the doc explains. And so looks as an evolution of laptop_mode. Would a guru or someone with knowledge about that be kind enough to specify the effect of vm.laptop_mode? kozaki (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- The effect of the
vm.laptop_mode
is described in the kernel docs in "The Details" section. The scripts that the docs talk about are probably Laptop Mode Tools nowadays. They are needed only to switch settings based on the current power source (and as a "bonus" they integrate most of the things in the Power_management#Power_saving section), but I bet the kernel settings are mostly the same as in 2004. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 08:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- I now see that, thank you Lahwaacz. Now as we may increase flush time to disk (to, say, ten minutes) via
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs
, delaying the flush up to five seconds via thevm.laptop_mode
knob doesn't make much sense regarding the disk power-savings... But it may help the cpu staying idle longer. Hence, whether set via laptop-mode-tools, tlp or proper self-made udev rules. I.e.vm.laptop_mode
andvm.dirty_*
together help delaying and grouping system's activity as a whole, allowing for longer power-saving efficient idle times. Please correct me if I'm wrong. kozaki (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- I now see that, thank you Lahwaacz. Now as we may increase flush time to disk (to, say, ten minutes) via
- True, but the delay via
vm.laptop_mode
makes sense also for other reasons. Let's sayvm.dirty_writeback_centisecs
is set to something like 10 minutes and the disk is spun down due to inactivity and stays like that for e.g. 8 minutes, when it spins up due to user activity. Flushing all the cummulated dirty pages to the disk immediately might delay the request which caused the disk to spin up, so it's better to wait couple of seconds until there is chance that small high-priority requests have been serviced. Also, it might take couple of seconds to spin up the disk. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- True, but the delay via
suspend to hibernate require fix
Rather than overriding the suspend.target
, I think we should just add RequiredBy=suspend.target
in the [Install]
section of the service. It works for me, and I think this is cleaner. Can anyone else confirm that this works?
--Svvac (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
network interfaces: udev rule does not work
At least a few other wiki pages point to this rule for how an example of how to turn off power management, because power mananagement breaks some current cards using the iwlwifi driver. Unfortunately the given udev rule does not work due to persistent device names. There is a note here about persistent device names, but it is really confusing. It stresses the importance of the number in the file name, but then states that it actually wont work anyway and to use the persistent name instead of the wildcard?? However even that won't work because the udev rule above has ACTION="add". At least in my case, that ACTION clause causes the rule to only trigger for the original device name (wlan0), and not the persistent name (wlp5s0). So if I use wlan0 everywhere, it triggers but has no effect. If I use wlp5s0 everywhere it never triggers. One solution is to remove the ACTION="add" clause and use the persistent name everywhere. Another solution is to continue using a wildcard in KERNEL, such as KERNEL="wl*", and then use the persistent name instead of %k in the RUN command. I chose the second solution and my full udev rule was this:
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="wl*", RUN+="/usr/bin/iw dev wlp5s0 set power_save off"
Note that I also tried using 99 instead of 70 for the filename with the original udev rule, but that did not work. Lllars (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- What the note tries to say is that you can't "use wlan0" everywhere as you did. In any case, the command is run after the interface gets a persistent name, so you need to run
iw dev wlp5s0 set power_save off
(or, as the note says,iw dev $name set power_save off
to make it generic). As for the matching,KERNEL
is the "old name" andNAME
is the "new name", which is assigned in80-net-setup-link.rules
. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. In a way it's nice to have so much detail about how udev manages the initial and persistent names. But the way this is currently written is still very confusing. Thanks to $name, it sounds like we could just change the given udev rule to:
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="wl*", RUN+="/usr/bin/iw dev $name set power_save on"
- Note that there are people who don't use the persistent names at all. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 06:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
RTC drift bug in suspend-to-hibernate script
For some time now I have been trying to figure out an issue with my laptop that seems to happen when I use the suspend-to-hibernate script: the laptop would immediately wake up after hibernating.
I took some more time to investigate today, and I think (unfortunately not confirmed 100% yet - the issue was fairly rare) that there is a race in the script that causes the RTC to immediately wake up the computer after it gets suspended. Specifically, the RTC is reset after the hibernate has started, so it is possible that the reset does not happen before the computer hibernates.
Further, the source for the current time is the command date
, whereas the RTC's idea of time might be a little different. I confirmed this by outputting /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/since_epoch
at the same time as date +%s
and saw delays as large as 4 seconds, but I suppose it could also get larger.
Combining the RTC drift and the fact that the RTC wakealarm reset happens after the hibernate has started, it is possible for the computer to immediately wake up from hibernation right after it hibernates if that happens quickly enough. This was especially noticeable in my case as it would then wait for me to enter my encryption password and drain my battery, overheating the CPU and the insides of my backpack.
I have two proposed changes to the script to make it better, but I suppose either one would fix the issue:
- Use
/sys/class/rtc/rtc0/since_epoch
as a base for the wakeup time, rather thandate
; - Reset the RTC wakealarm before hibernating (right after reading it would be ideal).
I will keep investigating to see if I don't get the issue anymore (as I said, it was fairly rare and thus hard to confirm that it has definitely stopped happening), but if I don't see it in the next week, I'll submit an edit to the wiki.
--Cynary (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Userspace tools
Power management#Userspace tools now provides a list of graphical power managers and statistics tools as well as laptop power managers for the commandline. The recommendation to use only one of the listed tools because they conflict doesn't really fit anymore, how should that be changed? -- Progandy (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- It could be changed to something like this: Be aware that using some of these tools in combination can result in unexpected behavior, such as double suspends. Please consult the documentation of the tool in question to see if there are any possible conflicts.
- -- Chazza (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- That sounds good. I looked a bit closer and most (all?) of the GUI tools do not have anything to do with power saving, they only monitor and sometimes react to low battery charge states. Maybe it would be better to split the list between power saving and power monitoring instead of GUI/Console? acpid and powertop do both, though.
- Progandy (talk) 18:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Most GUI tools are not just monitors, e.g. MATE Power Manager can be used to turn off the screen and suspend the system after specified time, which definitely saves the power. On the other hand, most console tools are more advanced solutions, allowing more detailed power tweaks.
- --City-busz (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Add tool to userspace tools
Add auto-cpufreq to Power_management#Console RaZorr (talk) 13:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- auto-cpufreqAUR may be more suitable under CPU frequency scaling#Userspace tools. -- Flyingpig (talk) 05:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Audio device power management
In Power_management#Audio it is stated that "audio power saving is turned off by most drivers". This is no longer true at least for snd_hda_intel, as of kernel 5.19.12-arch1-1. On my Dell Precision for example, this causes noise on headphones when no sound is playing. Indeed,
cat /sys/module/snd_hda_intel/parameters/power_save
shows 1 (enabled). Disabling it solves the issue. The following command can be used to test without rebooting:
sudo tee /sys/module/snd_hda_intel/parameters/power_save<<<0
I would like to update this section accordingly. Also, I wonder what is the best place to document this troubleshooting tip, if not already done. Thank you.--Topcat01 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Did you test this with "most drivers"? Otherwise your hardware may be just one of the few having such issues. — Lahwaacz (talk) 08:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's a good point and I thought of it too, but unfortunately I don't have access to other types of sound cards. In that case I'd just like to add a troubleshooting tip. Since this issue is caused by power management, I thought this page might be a good place. Advice welcome, thanks! -- Topcat01 (talk) 18:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, I noticed the idle noise only after the following updates, and on both regular and lts kernels:
- linux-lts (5.15.69-1 -> 5.15.71-1)
- linux (5.19.10.arch1-1 -> 5.19.12.arch1-1)
- -- Topcat01 (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it seems to be a kernel regression. The default power management setting did not change recently for snd_hda_intel in Arch's config. Also I tried other machines and they did not have this issue with snd_hda_intel when power saving is enabled (the default). In light of this the change I proposed is not necessary. It would still be useful to add a tip on how to toggle power saving on the fly for testing, which the sudo tee above does. -- Topcat01 (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)